Inferior vena cava filter tilting between placement and retrieval is associated with caval diameter and need for complex retrieval techniques.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nInferior vena cava (IVC) filter tilt may lead to apex embedment and need for advanced retrieval techniques. This study assesses factors associated with filter tilt change over time and need for complex retrieval procedures.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n252 consecutive patients underwent retrievable IVC filter placement and removal at a single academic institution over 58\xa0months. 182 (72.2%) patients met inclusion criteria. IVC filters included 168 (92.3%) Gunther Tulip and 14 (7.7%) Option filters. The primary outcome was medial-to-lateral IVC filter tilt change between placement and retrieval. Secondary outcomes included advanced retrieval technique use and multiple retrieval attempts. Independent variables included demographics, IVC diameter, filter hook position relative to the renal veins, and dwell time. Associations were determined using student s t-tests, ANOVA, and linear and logistic regressions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nMean IVC diameter at placement was 19.2\xa0±\xa03.3\xa0mm. Mean filter tilts at placement and retrieval were 6.1\xa0±\xa04.9° and 5.2\xa0±\xa05.0°, respectively. Mean tilt change was 5.0\xa0±\xa05.0°. Larger IVC diameter was associated with greater filter tilt change (p\xa0=\xa00.0004). While IVC diameter did not independently predict retrieval difficulty, greater tilt change and prolonged dwell time were associated with increased advanced retrieval technique use (p\xa0=\xa00.01 and 0.002, respectively). Results were unchanged in a subgroup analysis of patients treated with Gunther Tulip filters.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nLarger IVC diameter predicts increased filter tilt change, which in turn is associated with challenging retrievals. Attention to IVC diameter during filter placement may anticipate tilt-related complications.