Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia | 2021

Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Infusing Haploidentical K562-mb15-41BBL-Activated and Expanded Natural Killer Cells as Consolidation Therapy for Pediatric Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


BACKGROUND\nAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for approximately 20% of pediatric leukemia cases; 30% of these patients experience relapse. The antileukemia properties of natural killer (NK) cells and their safety profile have been reported in AML therapy. We proposed a phase 2, open, prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized clinical trial for the adoptive infusion of haploidentical K562-mb15-41BBL-activated and expanded NK (NKAE) cells as a consolidation strategy for children with favorable and intermediate risk AML in first complete remission after chemotherapy (NCT02763475).\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nBefore the NKAE cell infusion, patients underwent a lymphodepleting regimen. After the NKAE cell infusion, patients were administered low doses (1\xa0× 106/IU/m2) of subcutaneous interleukin-2. The primary study endpoint was AML relapse-free survival. We needed to include 35 patients to demonstrate a 50% reduction in relapses.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSeven patients (median age, 7.4 years; range, 0.78-15.98 years) were administered 13 infusions of NKAE cells, with a median of 36.44\xa0× 106 cells/kg (range, 6.92\xa0× 106 to 193.2\xa0× 106 cells/kg). We observed chimerism in 4 patients (median chimerism, 0.065%; range, 0.05-0.27%). After a median follow-up of 33 months, the disease of 6 patients (85.7%) remained in complete remission. The 3-year overall survival was 83.3% (95% confidence interval, 68.1-98.5), and the cumulative 3-year relapse rate was 28.6% (95% confidence interval, 11.5-45.7). The study was terminated early because of low patient recruitment.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study emphasizes the difficulties in recruiting patients for cell therapy trials, though NKAE cell infusion is safe and feasible. However, we cannot draw any conclusions regarding efficacy because of the small number of included patients and insufficient biological markers.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2021.01.013
Language English
Journal Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia

Full Text