Clinical radiology | 2019

The clinical value of PERCIST to predict tumour response and prognosis of patients with oesophageal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


AIM\nTo examine whether Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumours (PERCIST) is useful to predict tumour response and prognosis of patients with oesophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by surgery.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThis multicentre retrospective study included 60 patients with oesophageal cancer who underwent 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) before and after NACRT prior to surgery from January 2007 and June 2016. The correlation between pathological response and PERCIST was assessed by χ2 test. The prognostic significance was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were 30 responders and 30 non-responders pathologically. The complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD) were seen in 22, 29, seven, and two patients, respectively. There was a significant correlation between pathological response and PERCIST (p<0.001). Forty patients showed eventual progression, and 20 patients were alive without progression between the start of NACRT and last clinical follow-up (median follow-up period; 27 months [range, 3-107]). Pathological stage and PERCIST were significant for progression-free survival (PFS; p=0.044 and 0.006, respectively) and also significant for overall survival (OS; p=0.009 and 0.001, respectively) at univariate analysis. Pathological lymph node staging was also significant for OS at univariate analysis (p=0.018). At multivariate analysis, PERCIST remained significant and independent for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.59, p=0.046) and OS (HR: 1.82, p=0.008).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPERCIST may be useful for predicting tumour response and prognosis of patients with oesophageal cancer who received NACRT.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.132
Language English
Journal Clinical radiology

Full Text