Clinical radiology | 2021

Application of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral CT for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumours.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


AIM\nTo investigate the value of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral computed tomography (CT) in differentiating borderline epithelial ovarian tumours (BEOTs) from malignant epithelial ovarian tumours (MEOTs).\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nSixty patients who underwent pelvic contrast-enhanced spectral CT were divided into two groups for analysis based on the tumour types confirmed at histopathological examination (26 BEOTs and 34 MEOTs). The regions of interest (ROIs) were selected on solid tumour components to measure attenuation values on monochromatic image sets (40-140 keV) in all imaging phases and tumour iodine concentrations (IC) on material decomposition images. Differences in the attenuation value between the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced phases (enhancement degree) and between energy strengths (slope k, k\xa0=\xa0[attenuation at 40 keV- attenuation at 140 keV]/100) were calculated. All measurements between the two groups were compared with independent t-test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to calculate the sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of using combined parameters in two-phase contrast-enhanced images.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP), the BEOTs had significantly lower enhancement than MEOTs from 40 to 100 keV (p<0.05). The k values and IC values both showed significant differences in the AP and VP (p<0.05). Combining parameters in two contrast-enhanced phases provided 80.8% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity in differentiating MEOTs from BEOTs with an AUC of 0.844.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDual-energy spectral CT provides a multiparametric approach in differentiating BEOTs from MEOTs with the best diagnostic efficacy using combined parameters in the AP and VP images.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2021.04.004
Language English
Journal Clinical radiology

Full Text