A soft massage tool is advantageous for compressing deep soft tissue with low muscle tension: Therapeutic evidence for self-myofascial release.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES\nThis study aimed to compare the amount of deep tissue pressure and muscle relaxation between a soft inflatable rubber ball (SIRB) and a hard massage ball (HMB).\n\n\nDESIGN\nCrossover experimental design study.\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nThirty participants with neck pain (age: 65.9\u2009±\u20093.4, Neck Disability Index score: 34.0% ± 15.2) pillowed a SIRB or an HMB beneath the suboccipital region in the supine position. For the baseline condition, participants pillowed a foam block without a ball.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\nTo quantify the amount of deep-tissue pressure by a ball, compressed soft tissue thickness was measured with lateral cervical radiographs. To assess muscle relaxation, the amount of muscle tension was determined using electromyography of the sternocleidomastoid and upper trapezius muscles. To monitor the cervical lordosis in each condition, the extension angles of the cervical vertebrae were quantified using the relative rotation angles.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe compressed soft tissue thickness in the SIRB condition was significantly lower than that in the HMB condition. The normalised muscle activities exhibited that right sternocleidomastoid muscle activity in the HMB condition was significantly higher than that in the baseline and SIRB conditions. In the SIRB and HMB conditions, Numeric Rating Scale for pain was 0.2\u2009±\u20090.5 and 5.2\u2009±\u20091.4, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur findings demonstrate that a SIRB is more advantageous than an HMB for pressing the soft tissue deeply. This finding would be related to reduced muscle tension and discomfort in the SIRB condition when compared with the HMB condition.