Diabetes research and clinical practice | 2021

Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus Glargine 100 U/mL on Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemic Events in East Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Patient-level Meta-Analysis of Phase 3 Studies.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


AIMS\nTo evaluate efficacy and safety of Gla-300 with Gla-100 in a patient-level meta-analysis among large East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).\n\n\nMETHODS\nA patient level meta-analysis of three EDITION studies with similar design and endpoints were conducted over 6-months treatment period. The analysis included 547 patients treated with Gla-300 and 348 patients treated with Gla-100.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOver 6-month treatment period, mean change in HbA1c was similar for Gla-300 [Least square (LS) mean, (SE): -1.13 (0.05) % and Gla-100: -1.14 (0.05) %], showing non-inferiority of Gla-300 to Gla-100 (LS mean difference: 0.02%, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.11). Gla-300 was associated with reduced risk of hypoglycemic event (confirmed ≤3.9mmol/L or severe) vs Gla-100 at any time of day or at night (00:00-05:59 h). The event rates of hypoglycemia were consistently lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100. Severe hypoglycemia was rare in both treatment groups. Weight gain was minimal in both treatment groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nGla-300 provides comparable glycemic control to Gla-100 in East Asian patients with broad clinical spectrum of T2DM, with consistently less hypoglycemia at any time of the day and night.

Volume None
Pages \n 108848\n
DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108848
Language English
Journal Diabetes research and clinical practice

Full Text