Prognostic impact of initial tumor load and intraperitoneal disease dissemination patterns in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION\nComplete removal of disease is the most important prognostic factor for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. However, the influence of carcinomatosis distribution on prognosis is unknown and the prognostic impact of implant size according to their location is poorly studied. Our objective was to assess the impact of peritoneal carcinomatosis quantitative and qualitative localizations on progression free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (AEOC) after complete cytoreductive surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a monocentric cohort study, retrospective from October 2001 to July 2014. Inclusion criteria were high-grade AEOC patients without residual disease (CC0) after primary debulking surgery (PDS) or after interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was assessed according to qualitative criteria and quantitative criteria.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOne hundred and one patients were included. Median PFS was 21·2 months and median OS was 62·2 months. On the whole population, involvement of adipocytes-enriched areas tended to be associated with a decreased PFS and was significantly associated with a decreased OS. Any localization was associated with PFS or OS in the IDS subgroup. In the PDS subgroup, PCI score and involvement of the right mesocolic area were associated with a decreased PFS.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nInitial tumor load has not been found associated with PFS after complete surgery. Adipocytes-enriched areas and right mesocolic areas involvement were associated with poor prognosis in patients receiving primary debulking surgery. Larger-scale studies are needed to assess whether initial tumor load has a prognostic impact even after complete cytoreductive surgery is achieved.