Environmental pollution | 2019

Distribution of organophosphate esters between the gas phase and PM2.5 in urban Dalian, China.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


We investigated the concentrations and seasonal variations of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in the gas phase and PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5\xa0μm) in an urban area of Dalian, China, as well as their gas-particle partitioning. The total concentrations of OPEs in the gas phase were in the range of 0.056-6.38\xa0ng/m3 with the mean concentration of 0.83\xa0±\xa01.24\xa0ng/m3, while the concentrations of OPEs in the PM2.5 were in the range of 0.32-3.46\xa0ng/m3 with the mean concentration of 1.21\xa0±\xa00.67\xa0ng/m3. Tris-(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP) was the dominant congener in the gaseous phase, followed by tris-(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and tri-n-butylphosphate (TNBP), whereas TCEP was the dominant species in the PM2.5, followed by TCIPP and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP). Seasonality was discovered for OPEs in both gas phase and PM2.5 with their concentrations higher in hot seasons, which may due to the temperature-driven emission or gas-particle partitioning. The PM2.5-bound fractions of OPEs varied significantly between seasons. Tricresyl phosphate (TMPP), tri(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP), 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP), and TPHP were mostly adsorbed onto fine particles, while TNBP, TCEP, TCIPP, and tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) distributed in both gas and fine particle phases. The predicted PM2.5-bound fractions by Koa-based model were closer to the measurements for TCIPP, TDCIPP, and TPHP, whereas the predictions by Junge-Pankow model were closer to the measurements for TMPP and tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP). However, the predictions of both models cannot accurately match the measured gas-particle partitioning of TNBP and TCEP.

Volume 259
Pages \n 113882\n
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113882
Language English
Journal Environmental pollution

Full Text