Preterm birth and economic benefits of reduced maternal exposure to fine particulate matter

Abstract

ABSTRACT Preterm birth (PTB) is a predictor of infant mortality and later‐life morbidity. Despite recent declines, PTB rates remain high in the United States. Growing research suggests a possible relationship between a mother s exposure to common air pollutants, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and PTB of her baby. Many policy actions to reduce exposure to common air pollutants require benefit‐cost analysis (BCA), and it s possible that PTB will need to be included in BCA in the future. However, an estimate of the willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid PTB risk is not available, and a comprehensive alternative valuation of the health benefits of reducing pollutant‐related PTB currently does not exist. This paper demonstrates an approach to assess potential economic benefits of reducing PTB resulting from environmental exposures when an estimate of WTP to avoid PTB risk is unavailable. We utilized a recent meta‐analysis, county‐level air quality data and county‐level PTB prevalence data to estimate the potential health and economic benefits of a reduction in air pollution‐related PTB, with PM2.5 as our case study pollutant. Using this method, a simulated nationwide 10% decrease from 2008 PM2.5 levels resulted in an estimated reduction of 5016 PTBs and benefits of at least $339 million, potentially reaching over one billion dollars when considering later‐life effects of PTB. HighlightsEnvironmental contaminant exposures during pregnancy may contribute to preterm birth.Preterm birth leads to increased near‐term medical costs and later health effects.Estimated 5016 preterm births avoided from 10% reduction in 2008 particulate matter.Reduced preterm births result in estimated benefits of $339 million to $1 billion.Methodology could potentially be used in future health benefits assessments.