Fish & shellfish immunology | 2019

Multiple subtypes of TLR22 molecule from Schizothorax prenanti present the functional diversity in ligand recognition and signal activation.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Evolutionary development has increased the diversity of genotypes and the complexity of gene functions in fish. TLR22 has been identified as a teleost-specific gene, but its functions are tremendously different among different fish species. Whether the functional diversity relates to the difference of genotypes remains poorly understand. In this study, we cloned and identified three TLR22 molecules from Schizothorax prenanti (S. prenanti), named as spTLR22-1, spTLR22-2 and spTLR22-3. The full-length coding regions of spTLR22s are 2841 bp, 2805 bp and 2868 bp and coding 946 aa, 934 aa and 955 aa, respectively. All spTLR22s are composed of multiple leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains, a transmembrane structure and a Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) region. The phylogenetic analysis showed that three spTLR22s were close to Cyprinus carpio TLR22-1, TLR22-2 and TLR22-3, respectively. Among the spTLR22s, they presented not close relationship but remained to belong to TLR22 subfamily. All spTLR22s were ubiquitously expressed in all tested tissues, but the expression levels of spTLR22s were dominant in immune-related tissues, such as gill and spleen. The expression levels of spTLR22-1 and spTLR22-3 were significantly increased after treatment with bacteria, LPS and Poly(I:C). However, spTLR22-2 seems like no response to these treatments. The luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that all spTLR22s could activate NF-κB signaling pathway, but only spTLR22-1 and spTLR22-2 could activate IFN-β signaling pathway. Interestingly, in the ligand recognition analysis, spTLR22-1 and spTLR22-3 but not spTLR22-2 had the recognized potential to Poly(I:C), and all spTLR22s could not recognize LPS. Both spTLR22-1 and spTLR22-3 significantly up-regulated the expression of anti-viral-related genes (Mx, IFN and ISG15) and down-regulated the expression of anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 after the overexpression in carp EPC cell line, but spTLR22-2 failed to impact the expression of these genes. Moreover, we found that all spTLR22s localized to the intracellular region. Taken together, our results reveal that spTLR22-1 and spTLR22-3 but not spTLR22-2 may be involved into the anti-viral immune response via IFN-β signaling pathway, and all spTLR22s can activate NF-κB signaling pathway but only spTLR22-1 and spTLR22-3 response to the stimulation of bacteria and LPS.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.08.042
Language English
Journal Fish & shellfish immunology

Full Text