Management and Outcomes of Proximal Aortic Graft Infection: A Systematic Review.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nProximal aortic graft infection (PAGI) is a rare but often fatal postoperative complication. Its management often relied on surgical preferences and resource availability of each centre, until the recent unifying guidelines published by the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). This paper aimed to amalgamate the published experience in managing PAGI and their outcomes.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically. All primary studies besides single-patient case reports were included. Data extracted included study and patient characteristics, type of index surgery, type of microorganisms involved, definitive treatment modality, and any outcome measures reported.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 20 studies included, 157 of the 290 PAGI patients underwent complete graft explantation and replacement, 106 underwent graft-preservation interventions (debridement and/or irrigation), and 25 had antibiotics alone. Adjunctive interventions included graft coverage, vacuum-assisted closure, use of infection-resistant graft materials, and lifelong suppressive therapy. In-hospital mortality was 20.8% (n=60), with postoperative sepsis and multiorgan failure (n=24) being the most common cause. Recurrent infection occurred in 10 post-discharge patients. Post-discharge mortality rate was 11.4% (n=33), with cardiac complications and stroke being the most common cause in surgically-treated and medically-treated patients, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nGiven the risk of mortality, the management approach of PAGI highly depends on the fitness of the patient. We believe that early referral to specialised aortic centres is essential to plan for optimal management strategies and improve patient outcomes. Further studies are also required to parse out the most effective adjunctive interventions to maximise patient outcomes.