Long-term outcomes with balloon-expandable and self-expandable prostheses in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nData on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is scarce.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe investigated long term outcomes of consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with balloon- and self-expandable bioprostheses (Edwards SAPIEN (ESV), Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA, USA; Medtronic Corevalve system (MCS), Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA).\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmong 628 patients (mean age 82.4\u202f±\u202f5.8\u202fyears, 55% female), 489 (77.8%) underwent transfemoral TAVI. 309 (63.2%) patients received a MCS prosthesis, whereas 180 (36.8%) patients were treated with an ESV prosthesis. The median duration of follow-up amounted to 5.2\u202fyears (range 3.4-8.3\u202fyears). All-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups (MCS 46.9%, ESV 53.4%, CI 95%: RR 1.21 [0.93-1.57], P\u202f=\u202f0.15), whereas cardiac mortality was higher in the ESV cohort after 5\u202fyears of follow-up (MCS 35.1%, ESV 45.4%, CI 95%: RR 1.37 [1.01-1.86], P\u202f=\u202f0.04). Structural valve deterioration, which was on average diagnosed 41.9\u202fmonths (range 18-60\u202fmonths) after TAVI, occurred in 8 cases (1.6%), resulting in one repeat intervention.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWhile half of all patients died within 5\u202fyears after TAVI with no significant differences in all-cause mortality, structural valve deterioration was documented in <2% of cases.