Telemedicine versus on-site treatment at a surgical university clinic: Study of 225 consecutive patients

Abstract

INTRODUCTION\nRecently, telemedical services are increasingly used. It remains unclear, if outpatients in general surgery can be treated via telemedicine (e.g. telework). We aimed to evaluate, if diagnosis and therapies of outpatients in general surgery can be found using a mobile healthcare communication app instead of personal contact.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nIn a prospective, double blind, anonymized clinical study we included consecutive outpatients at a general surgery department at a university hospital. For the telemedical treatment the on-site doctors uploaded variables (e.g. anamnesis, radiograph, etc.) for each patient. The telemedical doctor received the information only via app and did not see the patient physically. Both, the doctor on-site and the virtual telemedical-doctor then uploaded the diagnosis and their suggested therapy - blinded to each other. The outpatient received the on-site treatment only. The virtual treatment was solely for scientific purposes and had no therapeutic impact.\n\n\nRESULTS\n225 consecutive surgical outpatients (53 % female and 47 % male) were included. Mean age was 61 years. In 84 % of cases the telemedical diagnosis matched the on-site diagnosis. The telemedical treatment was not inferior as compared to the on-site treatment in 94 % of all cases and the same therapy was proposed in 76 %. In 6% of all cases the telemedical therapeutic regimen could possibly harm or lead to an over- or under treatment of the patient.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nTelemedical consultation seems to work in the field of general surgery. Telemedicine in general surgery potentially could decrease waiting time for an appointment and patient frequency. However, the potential harm of a wrong therapy remains due to the lack of a clinical observation.