Saudi pediatric residents’ confidence in handling ethical situations and factors influencing it

Abstract

Background During their residency program, pediatric residents frequently face ethical challenges. The aim of the study is to evaluate the pediatric residents’ knowledge and confidence to handle common ethical dilemmas during their training. Methods This is a survey-based cross-sectional study on all pediatric residents in the largest pediatric training center in Saudi Arabia. The survey had six sections: a) Demographics and self-assessment of religiosity, b) Sources of ethics education, c) Degree of confidence in dealing with ethical challenges in clinical practice, d) Rating of the quality of ethics education during residency, e) Agreement or disagreement regarding ten ethical scenarios, and f) Confidence level in handling 21 different ethical situations. The response to the survey questions was based on a Likert scale; the survey was electronically distributed to all pediatrics residents. Mean knowledge scores and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each independent variable to test for associations. Comparisons were made using an independent t-test or an ANOVA test when there were more than two groups. Result Eighty residents responded to the study (85.1% response rate). Over 60% reported that the best source of ethical education for them was through discussions with a senior physician and it was through formal lecturers in 13.8%. One-fifth felt confident in dealing with ethical challenges. Only 2.5% rated the ethics education as “very good/excellent” and 12.5% rated the “support from residency program for ethics education” as being “very good/excellent.” Agreement of more than 80% was only noted for 4 of 10 of the ethical scenarios. Overall, only 16.4% felt “confident/extremely confident” in handling different ethical situations while 38.5% felt “not confident/a little confident” with more confidence among male residents (35.3% versus 18.7% p = 0.01). Marital status, year of residency, religiosity, and source of ethics knowledge had no impact on the level of confidence. Conclusion Overall, the ethics education was considered inadequate. Only one fifth had the confidence in dealing with ethical situations. Gender but not marital status, year of residency, religiosity, or source of ethics knowledge had an impact on the level of confidence in handling ethical situations.