Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology | 2019

Secukinumab drug survival in patients with psoriasis: A multicenter, real-world, retrospective study.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


To the Editor: Secukinumab, an interleukin 17A inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-tosevere plaque psoriasis, has shown high levels of clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile in both short-term and long-term clinical trials. However, in some studies in the real-life setting, secukinumab showed a 73%-78% drug survival at 12 months, shorter than that of other biologic agents, even among biologic-naive patients, and loss of effectiveness was the most common reason for discontinuation. To evaluate drug survival of secukinumab in a daily practice setting, we retrospectively evaluated all psoriatic patients starting secukinumab during January 2016-February 2017 at 11 centers in 3 European countries and followed them until February 2018 ( potentially with at least 1 year of observation period). Failure was defined as stopping secukinumab definitively or switching to a different therapy. Drug survival was analyzed using KaplaneMeier methodology. A total of 330 patients were included. Their median 6 standard deviation age was 51.9 6 14.6 years, 68% were male, and 19.6% were obese (body mass index [BMI]$30 kg/m); 21.5% of patients had a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis, and 52.4% were biologic-experienced (24.5% with $2 prior biologics). All patients were treated with the 300-mg label dose, and there was no dose adjustment throughout the treatment. Concomitant systemic therapy was used in 12% of patients (mostly methotrexate). Overall drug survival of secukinumab was 83% after 12 months and 78.8% after 18 months (Fig 1, A). The dropout rate at 18 months was 20%: 12.4% of patients were lost to follow-up, 6.7% of patients stopped because of drug ineffectiveness, 0.3% of patients discontinued because of adverse events, and 0.6% of patients decided to quit the drug. Drug survival rates at 12 and 18 months were lower for biologic-experienced than biologic-naive patients (Fig 1, B) and lower in obese than nonobese patients. Patients treated with concomitant systemic therapies also showed a lower drug survival rate than those treated with secukinumab monotherapy at 12 months (79.5% vs 94.2%, respectively) and 18 months (53.7% vs 81.8%, respectively). Univariate Cox regression analysis of drug survival determinants showed that prior use of [1 biologic and obesity at baseline were associated with decreased secukinumab drug survival (P \\ .05 or 95% confidence interval [1). The other variables evaluated (sex, age, presence of psoriatic arthritis, or baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) were not found to be significantly associated with drug survival. In this study, overall drug survival of secukinumab was higher than previously described. Although the reasons for the previously reported low secukinumab drug survival remains unclear, small patient cohorts with a high portion of biologic-experienced patients, who usually represent a difficult-to-treat population, could in part explain these results. Consistent with other studies, being biologic-experienced was associated with shorter drug survival. Lower secukinumab drug survival was seen in obese patients (BMI $30 kg/m), whereas another study identified body weight, not BMI, as a factor negatively affecting secukinumab drug survival. Nevertheless, BMI was also associated with poorer treatment response in both real-life and trial settings. In our experience, drug survival of secukinumab is not as low as initially reported. These findings are likely affected by the high rate of patients naive to biologic therapy (47.6%) and by the dropout rate (17% at 12 months and 20% at 18 months) in line or slightly lower than some recent real-life studies. Our study indicates the durability of secukinumab therapy in treating plaque psoriasis patients in the real-world setting, with relatively lower drug survival in biologic-experienced and obese patients. Tiago Torres, MD, PhD, Anna Balato, MD, Curdin Conrad, MD, PhD, Andrea Conti, MD, Paolo Dapavo, MD, Paulo Ferreira, MD, Francesca Gaiani, MD, Lu ız Leite, MD, Piergiorgio Malagoli, MD, Pedro MendesBastos, MD, Matteo Megna, MD, Francesco Messina, MD, Alessia Nidegger, MD, Giulia Odorici, MD, Stefano Piaserico, MD, PhD, Francesca Prignano, MD, Simone Ribero, MD, Federica Ricceri, MD, Annalisa Tonini, MD, Joana Val erio, MsC, and Andrea Chiricozzi, MD

Volume 81 1
Pages \n 273-275\n
DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.031
Language English
Journal Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Full Text