JACC. Clinical electrophysiology | 2021

Clinical and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Ventricular Tachycardias From the Basal Septum in Structural Heart Disease.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


OBJECTIVE\nThis study describes the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of basal-septal ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD).\n\n\nBACKGROUND\nThe basal septum is a common source of VT in patients with SHD.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData from 312 consecutive patients with SHD undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias were reviewed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThirty-three basal-septal VTs in 31 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 14.2 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 42% ± 15%) were identified. Patients with VTs with left ventricular basal-septal breakthrough were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy and lower LVEF; patients with right ventricular basal-septal VT were more likely to have sarcoidosis or right ventricular cardiomyopathy of unknown significance, with higher LVEF. Atrioventricular block was present in 45% of patients and intraventricular block including persistent biventricular pacing in 77%. Unipolar scar was larger than bipolar scar (area 18.8% ± 19.4% vs 12.7% ± 14.6%; P\xa0< 0.001). VTs with right bundle branch block configuration and S wave in lead V6 with positive V3/V4 polarity consistently indicated left ventricular basal-septal breakthrough. Inferior limb-lead discordance with right bundle branch block configuration and reverse pattern break in lead V2 were identified in left ventricular basal inferior-septal origin in 3 patients. VT noninducibility was achieved in 55%, and VT recurred in 42% of patients after a single procedure, but VT burden was significantly reduced after ablation (59 episodes before vs 2 episodes after ablation; P\xa0=\xa00.02).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBasal-septal VTs in patients with SHD have a distinct clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiological profile depending on the breakthrough site, accompanied by a deep intramural septal substrate that limits procedural success after catheter ablation.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.06.001
Language English
Journal JACC. Clinical electrophysiology

Full Text