Remote Collaborative Care with Off-Site Behavioral Health Care Managers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nIn the United States, the majority of patients who require behavioral health care do not receive it due to an overall shortage of behavioral health specialists. The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is a team-based, highly-coordinated approach to treating common mental health conditions in primary care that has a robust evidence base. Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the effectiveness of remote CoCM teams. As telehealth technology and uptake expands, understanding the evidence for remote CoCM becomes increasingly crucial to inform CoCM practice and implementation.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo systematically review RCTs regarding the effectiveness of remote CoCM teams in treating common psychiatric conditions in primary care and medical settings.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to structure our review. Our search strategy and development of search terms was informed by knowledge and review of the CoCM literature. Articles were reviewed by three authors and once selected, sent to two authors for further data extraction to describe various study characteristics and process measures relating to remote CoCM.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe literature search identified 13,211 articles, nine of which met inclusion criteria. The nine studies collectively demonstrate effectiveness of remote CoCM in treating a range of behavioral health conditions [(depression (n=7), anxiety (n=2), and PTSD (n=1)], across various populations and settings. Sample sizes ranged from 191 patients to 704 patients, publication dates from 2004 to 2018, and studies were conducted from 2000 to 2014. Various process measures were also reported.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAs the nine studies included in our systematic review demonstrate, remote CoCM can be effective in treating a range of behavioral health conditions in various primary care and specialty medical settings. These findings suggest organizations may have more flexibility in building their CoCM team and drawing upon wider workforces than previously recognized. As recent shifts in telehealth policy and practice continue to motivate telehealth approaches, further research that can inform best practices for remote CoCM will be useful and valuable to those making organizational decisions when implementing integrated care models.