Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nRenal colic is common, and CT is frequently utilized when the diagnosis of kidney stones is suspected. CT is accurate but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multi-organizational transdisciplinary collaboration sought evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn conjunction with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) eQual network, we formed a nine-member panel\xa0with three physician representatives each from ACEP, the ACR, and the American Urology Association. A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a three-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFrom an initial search yielding 6,337 records, there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the\xa0literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52%), excellent in 8 (28%), good in 3 (10%), and moderate in 3 (10%) of the 29 scenarios. There were no scenarios where at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24%), with ultrasound in 9 (31%) and no further imaging needed in 12\xa0(45%).\n\n\nSUMMARY\nEvidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasound or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation dose CT to be employed when CT is needed in patients with suspected renal colic.