Augmented reality in robotic assisted orthopaedic surgery: A pilot study

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nThe research and development of augmented-reality (AR) technologies in surgical applications has seen an evolution of the traditional user-interfaces (UI) utilised by clinicians when conducting robot-assisted orthopaedic surgeries. The typical UI for such systems relies on surgeons managing 3D medical imaging data in the 2D space of a touchscreen monitor, located away from the operating site. Conversely, AR can provide a composite view overlaying the real surgical scene with co-located virtual holographic representations of medical data, leading to a more immersive and intuitive operator experience.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThis work explores the integration of AR within an orthopaedic setting by capturing and replicating the UI of an existing surgical robot within an AR head-mounted display worn by the clinician. The resulting mixed-reality workflow enabled users to simultaneously view the operating-site and real-time holographic operating informatics when carrying out a robot-assisted patellofemoral-arthroplasty (PFA). Ten surgeons were recruited to test the impact of the AR system on procedure completion time and operating surface roughness.\n\n\nRESULTS & DISCUSSION\nThe integration of AR did not appear to require subjects to significantly alter their surgical techniques, which was demonstrated by non-significant changes to the study s clinical metrics, with a statistically insignificant mean increase in operating time (+0.778 s, p = 0.488) and a statistically insignificant change in mean surface roughness (p = 0.274). Additionally, a post-operative survey indicated a positive consensus on the usability of the AR system without incurring noticeable physical distress such as eyestrain or fatigue.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOverall, these study results demonstrated a successful integration of AR technologies within the framework of an existing robot-assisted surgical platform with no significant negative effects in two quantitative metrics of surgical performance, and a positive outcome relating to user-centric and ergonomic evaluation criteria.