Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers: Up to 10-year findings.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES\nIn this randomized split-mouth clinical trial the survival rate and quality of survival of indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers were evaluated.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA total of 48 indirect resin composite (Estenia; n\u202f=\u202f24) and ceramic laminate veneers (IPS Empress Esthetic; n\u202f=\u202f24) were placed on maxillary anterior teeth. Veneer preparations with incisal overlap were performed using a mock up technique. Survival of the restoration was considered the primary outcome measure and reported using Kaplan-Meier statistics and survival curves compared by means of Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test. After luting, restorations were evaluated by calibrated operators at baseline and every year thereafter, using modified USPHS criteria and compared by means of Mann-Whitney U test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn total, 6 failures were observed, consisting of debonding (n\u202f=\u202f3) and fracture (n\u202f=\u202f3), all in the group of the indirect resin composite laminate veneers. Cumulative chance on survival after 10 years of the indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers was 75% (se 3,8%) and 100% respectively (p\u202f=\u202f0.013). Of the surviving 42 laminate veneers, the variables color match (p\u202f=\u202f0.002), surface roughness (p\u202f=\u202f0.000), fracture of the restoration (p\u202f=\u202f0.028), and wear of the restoration (p\u202f=\u202f0.014), were significantly less favourable among the composite laminate veneers as well.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe ceramic veneers on maxillary anterior teeth in this study performed significantly better compared to the composite indirect laminate veneers after a decade, both in terms of survival rate and in terms of quality of the surviving restorations.\n\n\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\nWhen indicated, anterior ceramic laminate veneers may be preferred over indirect composite laminate veneers.