The Journal of hand surgery | 2021

Evaluating the Safety of the Hand Surgery Procedure Room: A Single-Center Cohort of 1,404 Surgical Encounters.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


PURPOSE\nPerforming hand surgeries in the procedure room (PR) setting instead of the operating room effectively reduces surgical costs. Understanding the safety or complication rates associated with the\xa0PR is important in determining the value of its use. Our purpose was to describe the incidence of\xa0medical and surgical complications among patients undergoing minor hand surgeries in the PR.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe retrospectively reviewed all adult patients who underwent an operation in the PR setting between December 2013 and May 2019 at a single tertiary academic medical center by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons. Baseline patient characteristics were described. Complication rates were obtained via chart review.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFor 1,404 PR surgical encounters, 1,796 procedures were performed. Mean patient age was 59 ± 15 years, 809 were female (57.6%), and average follow-up was 104 days. The most common surgeries were carpal tunnel release (39.9%), trigger finger release (35.9%), and finger mass or cyst excision (9.6%). Most surgeries were performed using a nonpneumatic wrist tourniquet (58%), whereas 42% used no tourniquet. No patient experienced a major medical complication. No procedure was aborted owing to intolerance. No patient required admission. No intraoperative surgical or medical complications occurred. Observed complications included delayed capillary refill requiring phentolamine administration after a trigger thumb release performed using epinephrine without a tourniquet (n\xa0= 1; 0.1%), complex regional pain syndrome (n\xa0= 3; 0.2%), infection requiring surgical debridement (n\xa0=\xa02; 0.2%), and recurrent symptoms requiring reoperation (n\xa0= 8; 0.7%).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn this cohort of patients in whom surgery was performed in a PR, there were no major intraoperative surgical or medical complications. There was a low rate of postoperative infection, development of complex regional pain syndrome, and a low need for revision surgery. These observations do not support the concern for safety as a barrier to performing minor hand surgery in the PR setting.\n\n\nTYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nTherapeutic IV.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.11.018
Language English
Journal The Journal of hand surgery

Full Text