Evaluation of Positioning Devices for Optimization of Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.

Abstract

In this review, we evaluate techniques, devices, and equipment for patient positioning and their effect on patient outcomes, such as cephalad slide and neuropathy, in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. We conducted a systematic review by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles published over a 15-year period. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by 2 reviewers independently. Seven articles, including 3 randomized controlled trials and 4 case series, were included in our analysis. Four studies evaluated cephalad patient slide. In 2 randomized controlled trials (n\u202f=\u202f103), the mean slide with various devices (i.e., memory foam, bean bag with shoulder braces, egg crate, and gel pad) ranged from 1.07 ± 1.93 cm to 4.5 ± 4.0 cm. The use of a bean bag with shoulder supports/braces was associated with minimal slide, with a median slide of 0 cm (range, 0-2 cm) in a retrospective series and with mean slide of 1.07 ± 1.93 cm in a randomized controlled trial (vs memory foam). No conclusive effect of body mass index on slide could be identified. Five studies evaluating the incidence of neuropathy found an overall incidence of 0.16% and no differences among slide-preventing devices. The minimal slide described across studies supports the conclusion that any of the currently used devices and techniques for safe patient positioning are within reason. The low overall incidence of neuropathy is also reassuring. Best evidence recommendations cannot be made for a specific device or technique; our findings suggest the importance of strict adherence to the basic tenets of safe patient positioning to minimize slide and prevent nerve injury.