Pain and operative technologies used in office hysteroscopy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nTo identify technologies associated with the least operative pain in women undergoing operative office hysteroscopic procedures.\n\n\nDATA SOURCES\nMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched until January 2021 using a combination of keywords hysteroscop* , endometrial ablation , outpatient , ambulatory , office and associated MeSH headings.\n\n\nMETHODS OF STUDY SELECTION\nRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of hysteroscopic devices on pain experienced by women undergoing operative office hysteroscopy were included. Data were also collected regarding efficacy, procedural time, adverse events and patient/clinician acceptability and/or satisfaction.\n\n\nTABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS\nThe search returned 5347 records. Ten studies provided data for review. Two trials compared endometrial ablation using bipolar radiofrequency with thermal balloon energy, with no significant difference in pain observed (p<0.05). Seven trials evaluated technologies for endometrial polypectomy of which four compared energy modalities; miniature bipolar electrode resection against resectoscopy (n=1), morcellation (n=2) and diode laser resection (n=1). Two studies compared hysteroscope diameter and one study compared methods of polyp retrieval. A significant reduction in pain was found using morcellators rather than miniature bipolar electrosurgical devices (p<0.001), 22Fr rather than 26Fr resectoscopes (p<0.001) and 3.5mm fiber-optic hysteroscopes with 7Fr forceps rather than 5mm lens-based hysteroscopes with 5Fr forceps (p<0.05). One study investigating septoplasty showed significant reduction in pain when cold mini-scissors, rather than a miniature bipolar electrode were used (p=0.013). Average procedural times ranged from 5 minutes 28 seconds to 22 minutes. The incidence of adverse events was low and data regarding efficacy and acceptability/satisfaction were limited.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPain is reduced when mechanical technologies such as morcellators and scissors are used compared to electrical devices for removing structural lesions in the office. For hysteroscopic and ablative procedures, smaller and quicker devices are less painful. Large-scale RCTs investigating patient pain and experience with modern operative devices in the office setting are urgently needed.