Routine evaluation of vesico-ureteric reflux in children with anorectal malformation does not reduce the rate of urinary tract infection.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nChildren with anorectal malformations (ARM) have a high rate of renal anomalies and increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). We aimed to determine whether using routine Micturating Cystourethrogram (MCUG) to detect VUR is effective in reducing the incidence of UTI or renal scarring in children with ARM.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective study of consecutive children diagnosed with ARM in two centres with a minimum of 3 years follow-up was performed, excluding those with cloaca or an MCUG prior to ARM repair. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine variables which were associated with VUR, UTI and renal scarring. Associations are described as Odd s Ratio (OR), 95% Confidence Interval. Significance was taken as p<0.05.\n\n\nRESULTS\n344 children were included with a median age of 8 years (IQR 5-11 years). 150 (44%) were female. 89 (26%) had renal anomalies and 101 (29%) had spine anomalies. 148 patients had routine MCUG and VUR was found in 62 (42%) of these children. Univariate analysis did not correlate any of the assessed variables with VUR or renal scarring. However, abnormal renal ultrasound - OR 6.18 (95% CI 2.99-13.07, p 0.0001) was associated with UTI whilst abnormal spine - OR 0.27 (95% CI 0.10-0.62, p 0.009), low ARM - OR 0.30 (CI 0.14-0.63, p 0.006) and intermediate ARM - OR 0.35 (CI 0.17-0.70, p 0.01) were associated with a reduced risk of UTI. On multivariate analysis, only abnormal renal USS retained a significant association with UTI (p<0.0001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nVUR is common in patients with ARM. Children with an abnormal R-USS are at increased risk of UTI. Performing routine MCUG does not reduce the risk of UTI in children with ARM.