Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of early enteral nutrition as an isolated component of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery [ERAS] in children after bowel anastomosis surgery: Pediatric ERAS and early enteral nutrition.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nPostoperative feeding practices are not uniform in children undergoing bowel anastomosis surgery. Primary aim of this review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early enteral nutrition (EEN) as an isolated component of enhanced recovery in children undergoing bowel anastomosis surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nMedical search engines (PubMed, CENTRAL, Google scholar) were accessed from inception to January 2021. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)s, non-randomized controlled trials, observational studies and retrospective studies comparing EEN, initiated within 48\xa0h vs late enteral nutrition (LEN), initiated after 48\xa0h in children ≤ 18 years undergoing bowel anastomosis surgery were included. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative complications (anastomotic leak, abdominal distension, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, vomiting and septic complications). Secondary outcome measures were the time to passage of first feces and the length of hospital stay.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwelve hundred and eighty-six children from 10 studies were included in this review. No difference was seen between the EEN and LEN groups in the incidence of anastomotic leak (1.69% vs 4.13%; p\xa0=\xa00.06), abdominal distention (13.87% vs 12.31%; p\xa0=\xa00.57), wound dehiscence (3.07% vs 2.69%; p\xa0=\xa00.69) or vomiting (8.11% vs 8.67%; p\xa0=\xa00.98). The incidence of surgical site infections (7.51% vs 11.72%; p\xa0=\xa00.04), septic complications (14.02% vs 26.22%; p\xa0=\xa00.02) as well as pooled overall complications (8.11% vs 11.27%; RR 0.71; 95% CI\xa0=\xa00.56 to 0.89; p\xa0=\xa00.003; I2\xa0=\xa033%) were significantly lower in the EEN group. The time to passage of first feces (MD - 17.23\xa0h; 95% CI -23.13 to -11.34; p\xa0<\xa00.00001; I2\xa0=\xa049%) and the length of hospital stay (MD -2.95 days; 95% CI -3.73 to -2.17; p\xa0<\xa00.00001; I2\xa0=\xa093%) were significantly less in the EEN group.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nEEN is safe and effective in children following bowel anastomosis surgery and is associated with a lower overall incidence of complications as compared to LEN. EEN also promotes early bowel recovery and hospital discharge. However, further well designed RCTs are required to validate these findings.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nV.