A comparison of aortic root measurements by echocardiography and computed tomography

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study is to evaluate an optimal way to assess the dimensions of the aortic root and each of the sinuses of Valsalva and examine how a single measurement in 1 plane (echocardiography or 2‐dimensional computed tomography) can underestimate the maximum dimension of the aortic root. Methods Computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography images of the aortic root and ascending aorta of 112 patients were analyzed. The minimum and maximum aortic root dimensions, the root perimeter, and the total area of all 3 sinuses of Valsalva were measured on a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the aorta using 3‐dimensional multiplanar reconstruction. Moreover, the maximum root dimension was compared with the measurements obtained from the echocardiography and 2‐dimensional computed tomography angiography measurements. Results The difference in the measurements of the minimum and maximum root dimension was 5.4 ± 3.2 mm (range, 0‐21 mm, P < .0001) and was significantly larger in patients with bicuspid aortic valves compared with those with tricuspid valves (6.3 ± 4 mm, range, 0‐21 mm vs 4.9 ± 2.6 mm, range, 0‐15 mm, P = .036). The maximum root dimension measured in 3‐dimensional multiplanar reconstruction (49.1 ± 9.0 mm) differed significantly from the root dimension measured in transthoracic echocardiography in the parasternal long‐axis view (44.8 ± 8.4 mm) and 2‐dimensional computed tomography (axial plane: 45.5 ± 9.0 mm, coronal plane: 46.1 ± 8.8 mm, sagittal plane: 45.1 ± 8.9 mm) (P < .001). Conclusions The difference in the measurements of the minimum and maximum aortic root dimensions is significant and may exceed 20 mm, especially in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Therefore, aortic root dimensions can be significantly underestimated with the measurement (echocardiography, computed tomography angiography) performed in only 1 plane.