Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction implemented by the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System over a minimum follow-up of 10\u202fyears.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nThis study evaluated the long-term clinical follow-up results of patients who underwent double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS).\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients were assessed using clinical scores that included the Tegner activity level scale, the Lysholm score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. KT-1000 was adopted to assess stability. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate osteoarthritis and LARS condition.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThis study examined 38 patients, of which follow-up procedures were completed for 33 patients, resulting in a follow-up rate of 86.8%. The average follow-up period was 11.9\u202f±\u202f1.2\u202fyears (range: 10.3-14.2\u202fyears). The median scores of the clinical scales were as follows: Tegner activity score, 6 (range: five to seven); Lysholm score, 90 (range: 67-100); and IKDC score, 89.7 (range: 46-100). The median of the side-to-side difference (SSD) was four millimeters (range: 0-10\u202fmm). In radiographs, the moderate OA rate was 6.9%. MRI results revealed that 26 patients exhibited ingrowth and 11 patients exhibited partial rupture of the LARS. With SSD\u202f≤\u202f3\u202fmm set as the standard for successful knee stabilization, the optimal cutoff point of LARS midsubstance thickness in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was 14.3\u202fmm.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nLong-term follow-up of the studied patients demonstrated the durability of LARS. However, clinical outcomes showed no enhancement using LARS, so it is not recommended for routine use in PCL reconstruction.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nIV.