Midwifery | 2021

The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: Qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


OBJECTIVE\nTo explore if and how women perceived their prenatal care to have changed as a result of COVID-19 and the impact of those changes on pregnant women.\n\n\nDESIGN\nQualitative analysis of open-ended prompts included as part of an anonymous, online, cross-sectional survey of pregnant women in the United States.\n\n\nSETTING\nOnline survey with participants from 47 states within the U.S.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nSelf-identified pregnant women recruited through Facebook, Twitter, and other online sources.\n\n\nMEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS\nAn anonymous, online survey of pregnant women (distributed April 3 - 24, 2020) included an open-ended prompt asking women to tell us how COVID-19 had affected their prenatal care. Open-ended narrative responses were downloaded into Excel and coded using the Attride-Sterling Framework. 2519 pregnant women from 47 states responded to the survey, 88.4% of whom had at least one previous birth. Mean age was 32.7 years, mean weeks pregnant was 24.3 weeks, and mean number of prenatal visits at the point of the survey was 6.5. Predominant themes of the open narratives included COVID-19 s role in creating structural changes within the healthcare system (reported spontaneously by 2075 respondents), behavioral changes among both pregnant women and their providers (reported by 429 respondents), and emotional consequences for women who were pregnant (reported by 503 respondents) during the pandemic. Changes resulting from COVID-19 varied widely by provider, and women s perceptions of the impact on quality of care ranged from perceiving care as extremely compromised to perceiving it to be improved as a result of the pandemic.\n\n\nKEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\nWomen who are pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic have faced enormous upheaval as hospitals and healthcare providers have struggled to meet the simultaneous and often competing demands of infection prevention, pandemic preparedness, high patient volumes of extremely sick patients, and the needs of non-urgent pregnant patients. In some settings, women described very few changes, whereas others reported radical changes implemented seemingly overnight. While infection rates may drive variable responses, these inconsistencies raise important questions regarding the need for local, state, national, or even global recommendations for the care of pregnant women during a global pandemic such as COVID-19.

Volume 98
Pages \n 102991\n
DOI 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102991
Language English
Journal Midwifery

Full Text