Comparing unilateral vs. bilateral neck management in lateralized oropharyngeal cancer between surgical and radiation oncologists: An international practice pattern survey.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nManagement of the neck in oropharyngeal carcinoma varies due to a lack of clarity of patterns of lymphatic drainage and concern of failure in the contralateral neck. With recent advances in transoral surgical techniques, surgical management has become increasingly prevalent as the primary treatment modality. We compare international practice patterns between surgical and radiation oncologists.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA survey of neck management practice patterns was developed and pilot tested by 6 experts. The survey comprised items eliciting the nature of clinical practice, as well as patterns of neck management depending on extent of nodal disease and location and extent of primary site disease. Proportions of surgical and radiation oncologists treating the neck bilaterally were compared using the chi-squared statistic.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwo-hundred and twenty-two responses were received from 172 surgical oncologists, 44 radiation oncologists, 3 medical oncologists, and 3 non-oncologists from 32 different countries. For tongue base cancers within 1\xa0cm of midline (67% vs. 100%, p\xa0<\xa00.001), and for tonsil cancers with extension to the medial 1/3 of the soft palate (65% vs. 100%, p\xa0<\xa00.001) or tongue base (77% vs. 100%, p\xa0<\xa00.001), surgical oncologists were less likely to treat the neck bilaterally. For isolated tonsil fossa cancers with no nodal disease, both surgical and radiation oncologists were similarly likely to treat unilaterally (99% vs. 97%, p\xa0=\xa0NS). However, with increasing nodal burden, radiation oncologists were more likely to treat bilaterally for scenarios with a single node\xa0<\xa03\xa0cm (15% vs. 2%, p\xa0<\xa00.001), a single node with extranodal extension (41% vs. 18%, p\xa0<\xa00.001), multiple positive nodes (55% vs. 23% p\xa0<\xa00.001), and node(s)\xa0>\xa06\xa0cm (86% vs. 33%, p\xa0<\xa00.001). For tumors with midline extension, even with a negative PET in the contralateral neck, the majority of surgical and radiation oncologists would still treat the neck bilaterally (53% and 84% respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe present study demonstrates significant practice pattern variability for management of the neck in patients with lateralized oropharyngeal carcinoma. Surgical oncologists are less likely to treat the neck bilaterally, regardless of tumor location or nodal burden. Even in the absence of disease in the contralateral neck on imaging, them majority of practitioners are likely to treat bilaterally when the disease approaches midline.