Clinical outcome and return to sports activity after surgical treatment for recurrent shoulder instability with a modified Latarjet procedure.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION\nThe Latarjet procedure is an attractive surgical option for the management of chronic anterior shoulder instability. The original surgical approach involves the vertical tenotomy of the subscapularis tendon. Alternatively, the subscapularis muscle is split longitudinally and the tendon left attached at the lesser tuberosity.\n\n\nHYPOTHESIS\nThe hypothesis is that the longitudinal split is of functional advantage and may lead to better functional results and earlier return to sports activities compared to the vertical tenotomy.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\n32 patients were included in this retrospective cohort study. In 14 patients, the subscapularis tendon was vertically incised (group A), whereas in 18 patients, the subscapularis muscle was split longitudinally (group B). Patients were evaluated at 1 year (FU1) and 2 years (FU2) after the Latarjet procedure. Results at follow-up were correlated with patient-specific data and compared with the preoperative status. Primary outcomes were the functional assessment based on Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index and Constant Score (CS) and the assessment of the return to sports activity. Patients demographics, duration of surgery, and the rate of recurrent dislocations were recorded as secondary variables.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAll patients started their sports activities with a mean ± SD of 12.41 ± 1.24 weeks. Interestingly, the time from surgery to full recovery of sports activities was significantly longer for group A (mean ± SD of 30.17 ± 10.36 weeks) compared to group B (mean ± SD of 20.71 ± 3.67 weeks). There is a statistically significant decrease of the WOSI score from the preoperative level compared to FU1 and FU2, indicating a decrease in instability related symptoms during the entire follow up period with no statistically significant difference between group A and B. There is an increase in shoulder function during the entire follow up period based on the CS. Most interestingly, there is a statistically significant difference between group A and B at FU1, indicating a significantly better shoulder function for group B at the early follow up timepoint (FU1). At the later follow up timepoint (FU2), no difference exists in the individual items. However, a significantly better total CS remains in group B, indicating an overall improved function compared to group A.\n\n\nDISCUSSION/CONCLUSION\nThe longitudinal split of subscapularis muscle is a safe approach which leads to quicker functional recovery and return to sports activity compared to the vertical tenotomy, which is a benefit especially for active individuals. It is therefore recommended as the standard surgical approach.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nIII; Retrospective cohort study.