Parkinsonism & related disorders | 2019
Pupillary response to light and tasks in early and late onset essential tremor patients.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION\nLate-onset essential tremor is characterised by shorter life expectancy and more advanced aging parameters and may therefore be an aging-related tremor. Brainstem functions involved in pupillary responses are hypothesized to reflect such earlier aging. The pupillary light response (PLR) and a task evoked pupillary response (TEPR) were used to test this hypothesis in same-aged patients with early onset (EOET) and late onset (LOET) essential tremor and healthy controls.\n\n\nSUBJECTS AND METHODS\nAge related changes of the PLR and TEPR during the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) were tested in 57 normal subjects. Subsequently, 13 patients with LOET and 16 patients with EOET were compared with 15 age matched healthy controls. Standard parameters of PLR were recorded, amongst others the time to maximum acceleration of the PLR (T1) and the time to maximum velocity (T2). The TEPR was determined during the PASAT as the percentage change in pupil size (PCPS). Data were analysed with ANOVA and post-hoc testing.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn normal subjects the pupil diameter, latency, maximum acceleration/velocity and percentage amplitude were correlated with age. Latency of the pupillary light response was significantly longer in LOET compared to controls and EOET while no differences were found between EOET and controls. The TEPR showed no significant differences between the three groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nLOET showed a prolonged latency of the PLR compared to EOET possibly indicating premature aging or rather pathophysiological differences on brainstem level. This study further supports the hypothesis of abnormal aging in LOET.