The Journal of prosthetic dentistry | 2021

Comparison of surface roughness and color stainability of 3-dimensionally printed interim prosthodontic material with conventionally fabricated and CAD-CAM milled materials.

 
 
 

Abstract


STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\nStudies on the surface roughness and color stainability of interim prostheses produced with 3-dimensional-printing technology are lacking.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThe purpose of this in\xa0vitro study was to investigate the effect of different surface treatments on the surface roughness and stainability of 3-dimensionally printed, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled and conventional interim materials.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nA total of 320 specimens were fabricated from autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate, bis-acryl composite resin, CAD-CAM polymethyl methacrylate resin (milled), and 3-dimensionally printed composite resin (printed) (n=80). A group of each material was divided into 2 groups (n=40) as per the applied surface treatment procedure: conventional polishing (C) or coated with a surface sealant (B). Surface roughness values were measured with a profilometer. Each group of specimens was then divided into 4 subgroups (n=10) and stored for 1 day, 7 days, and 30 days at 37 °C in different solutions: distilled water, cola, coffee, and red wine. Color parameters were measured with a spectrophotometer before and after each storage period, and color differences (CIEDE2000 [ΔE00]) were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with the Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test followed by the Friedman test (α=.05).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe highest surface roughness values were determined for the polymethyl methacrylate -C, and the lowest were observed in the printed-B. After 30 days, the highest mean ΔE00 values were observed in polymethyl methacrylate-C for all staining solutions (P=.001). The highest ΔE00 for all materials was observed in the red wine group. Color change increased significantly with storage duration (P=.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAll tested materials had a surface roughness higher than the plaque accumulation threshold (0.2 μm). The surface roughness values of coated materials were significantly lower than those of their conventionally polished groups, except for the printed groups. The application of a surface sealant agent significantly decreased the staining of the materials.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.027
Language English
Journal The Journal of prosthetic dentistry

Full Text