Coping strategies and mental health trajectories during the first 21 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom.

Abstract

RATIONALE\nThe negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health is well evidenced. However, there is little research on how individuals coping strategies were related to changes in mental health over time.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe current study used data from the COVID-19 Social Study in the United Kingdom (N\xa0=\xa026,505) to explore whether coping strategies (problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidant, and socially-supportive) were associated with (i) better mental health as lockdown was introduced, and (ii) faster recovery over time.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPeople with greater use of problem-focused, avoidant, and supportive coping displayed more mental health symptoms, while greater use of emotion-focused coping was associated with fewer mental health symptoms. Symptoms decreased over time for all coping strategies, but only socially-supportive coping was associated with a faster decrease in anxiety and depressive symptoms, indicating a potential protective effect of social support on psychological distress.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nProblem-, avoidant- and emotion-focused coping strategies were not associated with faster improvements in mental health. Suggesting the adoption of one of these coping styles in itself is not necessarily a driver of improvements in mental health; rather, specific attributes of the behaviours expressed as part of this coping style appear to be important in and of themselves.