Endplate Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Is a Predictor for Cage Subsidence following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Risk Factor Analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT\nIt has been reported in previous studies that a decreased bone mineral density (BMD) as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is associated with subsidence. However, there is limited research on the role of volumetric BMD (vBMD) as measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Further, metabolic conditions such as obesity and type 2 diabetes have been associated with poor bone quality, but the impact of these metabolic conditions on on subsidence rates following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) remains unclear. As such, risk factors for subsidence following LLIF is an area of ongoing research.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThe purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for subsidence following LLIF with a focus on metabolic conditions and vBMD as measured by QCT.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN/SETTING\nRetrospective cohort study at a single academic institution.\n\n\nPATIENT SAMPLE\nConsecutive patients undergoing LLIF with or without posterior screws from 2014 to 2019 at a single academic institution who had a pre-operative CT and radiological imaging including radiographs or CT scans between 5 and 14 months post-operatively to assess for cage subsidence.\n\n\nOUTCOME MEASURE\nSubsidence prevalence following LLIF.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe reviewed patients undergoing LLIF with or without posterior screws from 2014 to 2019 with a follow-up ≥5 months. Cage subsidence was assessed using the grading system by Marchi et al. Endplate volumetric BMD (EP-vBMD), vertebral bone volumetric BMD (VB-vBMD), BMI, and diabetes status were measured. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analyses with a generalized mixed model were conducted. Ad hoc analysis, including receiver operative characteristic curve analysis, was used for identifying the cut-off values in significant continuous variables for subsidence. Chi-Squared and ANOVA tests were used for categorical comparisons.\n\n\nRESULTS\n567 levels in 347 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age (± SD) was 61.7 ± 11.1yrs, 50.3% were male, and 89.6% were Caucasian. Subsidence was observed in 160 levels (28.2%). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an absence of posterior screws [OR\u202f=\u202f2.854 (1.483 - 5.215), p=0.001] and decreased EP-vBMD [0.996 (0.991 - 1.000), p=0.032] were associated with an increased risk of subsidence. Increased BMI and diabetes status were not associated with increased rates of subsidence. Patients without posterior screws and low EP-vBMD experienced subsidence at 44.9% of levels.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur results demonstrated that decreased EP-vBMD and standalone status were significantly associated with increased rates of subsidence following LLIF independent of BMI or diabetes status. Further analysis demonstrated that patients with a decreased EP-vBMD and without posterior screws experienced subsidence nearly 2.5 times higher than patients with no risk factors. In patients with a low EP-vBMD undergoing LLIF, posterior screws should be considered.