Trends In Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery at a Tertiary Center: Midurethral Sling Use Following The AUGS/SUFU Position Statement.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES\nTo investigate trends in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery before and after the 2011 FDA notification and the 2014 AUGS/SUFU position statement.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients presenting for evaluation of SUI by two Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) specialists between June 1, 2010 and May 31, 2017. Rates of surgical treatment modality (synthetic midurethral slings (MUS) vs. autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) vs. bulking agents) were analyzed at 6 month intervals.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOver 14 six-month intervals, the number of new patients presenting for evaluation of SUI increased consistently. There was a decrease in the proportion of new patients who underwent anti-incontinence surgical procedures, specifically MUS, between December 2011 and December 2013. After the integration of the 2014 AUGS/SUFU position statement in patient counseling, this trend reverted and we noted a sustained increase in the proportion of patients electing surgical management. This paralleled an increase in new patient visits for SUI and MUS. The number AFPVS remained stable throughout the study period. Conversely, MUS composed the highest proportion of procedures performed, accounting for 60 % to 87.2% off all anti-incontinence procedures.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nAfter the FDA Public Health Notification in 2011, we observed a decline in the number of new patients presenting with SUI electing surgical management, specifically MUS. However, after the AUGS/SUFU position statement publication and integration into counseling, we observed a reversal in the previous year s trends, noting a resurgence of MUS utilization.