Epilepsy & Behavior | 2019

Hemispheric language lateralization in presurgical patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: Improving the retest reliability of functional transcranial Doppler sonography

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Since its introduction, functional transcranial Doppler sonography (fTCD) has been extensively applied in research and clinical settings and has now become part of the routine presurgical work-up of patients with epilepsy. Because of its importance in planning neurosurgical interventions and predicting possible cognitive risks, the reproducibility of fTCD in determining hemispheric language lateralization (HLL) has to be ensured. In the present study, fTCD was performed twice in 33 initially lateralized patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) as part of their presurgical work-up, using a standard word generation paradigm. Initially, the standard analysis, including only the statistical examination of fTCD data, was applied, and a rather poor retest reliability of r\u202f=\u202f0.41 was obtained (p\u202f=\u202f0.017). Because of doubts concerning appropriate task performance in some patients, subsequently, a two-step data analysis was introduced, including an additional qualitative evaluation of fTCD data regarding (1) instruction-compliant task performance, (2) sufficient quality of the baseline phase, and (3) adequate increase in cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) during the activation phase. Attributable to a more valid interpretation of fTCD data after the application of the qualitative step, the reproducibility of HLL significantly improved (p\u202f=\u202f0.007) to a high retest reliability of r\u202f=\u202f0.84 (p\u202f<\u202f0.000). In clinical settings, psychological and situational factors seem to strongly influence the reproducibility of fTCD determining HLL. Accordingly, we highly recommend the complementation of the standard statistical examination of fTCD data by an additional qualitative evaluation (two-step data analysis), as this extra security is particularly desirable because of its direct implications for the further evaluation of neurosurgical interventions. This article is part of the Special Issue Individualized Epilepsy Management: Medicines, Surgery and Beyond .

Volume 91
Pages 48-52
DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.08.014
Language English
Journal Epilepsy & Behavior

Full Text