Improved everyday executive functioning following profound reduction in seizure frequency with fenfluramine: Analysis from a phase 3 long-term extension study in children/young adults with Dravet syndrome

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nIndividuals with Dravet syndrome (DS) experience frequent pharmacoresistant seizures beginning in infancy. Most exhibit poor neurodevelopmental outcomes including motor function difficulties, behavior problems, and cognitive impairment. Cognitive deficits in children with DS have been associated with seizure frequency and antiseizure medication (ASM) use. Recent research in children and young adults with DS has begun to examine the role of executive functions (EFs), as these include higher-order cognitive functions and may mediate the relationship between risk factors and cognitive impairment. Current conceptualizations, however, of EFs involve the broader self-regulation of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional domains. We explored relationships between reduction in convulsive seizure frequency and everyday EFs in a subset of children and young adults with DS treated with adjunctive fenfluramine for 1\u202fyear.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis is a post-hoc analysis of data from children and young adults with Dravet syndrome aged 5-18\u202fyears who participated in a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (core study) followed by completion of at least 1\u202fyear of fenfluramine treatment in an open-label extension (OLE) study. Eligible children and young adults started the OLE study at 0.2\u202fmg/kg/day fenfluramine and were titrated to optimal seizure control and tolerability (maximum daily dose: 26\u202fmg/day). Parents/caregivers documented convulsive seizure frequency per 28\u202fdays (i.e., monthly convulsive seizure frequency [MCSF]) by electronic diary. A parent/caregiver for each child also completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF®) parent form, a questionnaire capturing parents /caregivers perceptions of everyday EF that was included as a safety measure to assess treatment-related adverse effects on EF during the trial. Ratings on BRIEF® were mapped to the current edition, the BRIEF®2 parent form, and were used to calculate T-scores for the Behavior Regulation Index (BRI), Emotion Regulation Index (ERI), Cognitive Regulation Index (CRI), and Global Executive Composite (GEC). Change in BRIEF®2 T-scores from baseline in the core study to Year 1 of the OLE study was calculated. Spearman s rho correlation coefficients assessed associations between change in BRIEF®2 indexes/composite T-scores and percentage change in MCSF. Children and young adults were divided into 2 groups based on percentage of MCSF reduction achieved from pre-randomization baseline in the core study to Year 1 of the OLE study: <50% and ≥50% MCSF reduction. Changes in the distribution of BRIEF®2 indexes/composite T-scores were compared between MCSF reduction groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. The proportions of children and young adults in these groups who showed clinically meaningful improvement in everyday EF, defined as Reliable Change Index (RCI) values ≥95% certainty relative to a reference population of neurotypically developing healthy volunteers, were then assessed by cross-tabulations and Somers D tests (p\u202f≤\u202f0.05). When there was a significant meaningful improvement in an index score, post-hoc analyses using the same statistical methods were conducted to evaluate the individual BRIEF®2 scales composing that index. Supplemental analyses examined the proportions of patients in MCSF reduction groups <25% and ≥75% who achieved clinically meaningful improvement or worsening in everyday EF using RCI values ≥95% certainty and ≥80% certainty, respectively, relative to the reference population.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAt the time of analysis, 58 children and young adults (mean age: 11\u202f±\u202f4\u202fyears) had reached OLE Year 1 of fenfluramine treatment with a 75% median percentage reduction in seizure frequency from pre-randomization baseline. Overall, there was a significant correlation between change in MCSF and change in BRIEF®2 T-scores for ERI (p\u202f=\u202f0.008), but not for BRI, CRI, or GEC (p\u202f>\u202f0.05). At OLE Year 1, 78% (n\u202f=\u202f45) of total children/young adults had ≥50% MCSF reduction (50% [n\u202f=\u202f29] achieved ≥75% MCSF reduction) and 22% (n\u202f=\u202f13) of total children/young adults had <50% MCSF reduction (12% [n\u202f=\u202f7] showed <25% MCSF reduction). The ≥50% MCSF reduction group was significantly more likely to achieve clinically meaningful improvement (RCI\u202f≥\u202f95% certainty) in ERI (p\u202f=\u202f0.002) and in CRI (p\u202f=\u202f0.001) than the <50% MCSF reduction group. There were no significant differences in the proportions of children and young adults in the 2 MCSF reduction groups showing clinically meaningful worsening (RCI\u202f≥\u202f80% certainty) on the BRIEF®2 indexes/composite.\n\n\nSIGNIFICANCE\nIn children and young adults with DS, the magnitude of reduction in MCSF after long-term treatment with adjunctive fenfluramine was associated with clinically meaningful levels of improvement in everyday EF. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of children and young adults treated with adjunctive fenfluramine for 1\u202fyear in the OLE study achieved ≥50% reduction in MCSF, for a magnitude of efficacy associated with a significantly greater likelihood of experiencing clinically meaningful improvement in emotion regulation and cognitive regulation.