Gynecologic Oncology | 2019

An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Objectives We evaluated four different treatment regimens for advanced-stage mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter randomized factorial trial (UK and US). Patients were diagnosed with primary mEOC: FIGO stage II–IV or recurrence after stage I disease. Treatment arms were paclitaxel-carboplatin, oxaliplatin-capecitabine, paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab, or oxaliplatin-capecitabine-bevacizumab. Chemotherapy was given 3-weekly for 6\u202fcycles, and bevacizumab (3-weekly) was continued as maintenance (for 12\u202fcycles). Endpoints included overall-survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Results The trial stopped after 50 patients were recruited due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 59\u202fmonths. OS hazard ratios (HR) for the two main comparisons were: 0.78 (p\u202f=\u202f0.48) for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo (each with/without bevacizumab), and 1.04 (p\u202f=\u202f0.92) for bevacizumab vs. no bevacizumab. Corresponding PFS HRs were: 0.84 and 0.80. Retrospective central pathology review revealed only 45% (18/40) cases with available material had confirmed primary mEOC. Among these, OS HR for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo was 0.36 (p\u202f=\u202f0.14); PFS HR\u202f=\u202f0.62 (p\u202f=\u202f0.40). Grade 3–4 toxicity was seen in 61% Pac-Carbo, 61% Oxal-Cape, 54% Pac-Carbo-Bev, and 85% Oxal-Cape-Bev. QoL was similar between the four arms. Conclusion mEOC/GOG0241 represents an example of a randomized rare tumor trial. Logistical challenges led to early termination, including difficulties in local histopathological diagnosis and accessing drugs outside their labelled indication. There was misalignment between central funders who support clinical trials in rare cancers and the deprioritisation of such work by those managing and funding research at a local level. Rare cancer trials should include centralised pathology review before treatment. Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN83438782.

Volume 153
Pages 541 - 548
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.256
Language English
Journal Gynecologic Oncology

Full Text