[Physical activity and activities of daily living of nursing homes residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nInterventions to promote physical activity in nursing homes are among the priorities of German long-term care insurance funds. We summarized the evidence on the effectiveness of such interventions.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a systematic literature search in five electronic databases in November 2019, which was complemented by searching reference lists and trials registries. Eligible studies included individually (RCTs) or cluster randomized trials or non-randomized comparative studies that investigated the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in nursing home residents and their impact on the ability to perform activities of daily living. Results were synthesized using random effects meta-analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nMeta-analysis of 19 included studies with high risk of bias showed a small yet statistically significant effect on activities of daily living (SMD\xa0=\xa00.40, 95\xa0% CI\xa00.08-0.72); heterogeneity was substantial (I2\xa0=\xa077\xa0%, p\xa0<\xa00.0001). Sensitivity analysis excluding two non-randomized comparative studies did not alter the results (SMD\xa0=\xa00.40, 95\xa0% CI\xa00.03-0.76). The effect attenuated but was still statistically significant in a meta-analysis which excluded five studies that were largely responsible for the heterogeneity (SMD\xa0=\xa00.27, 95\xa0% CI\xa00.12-0.43,\xa0I2=34\xa0%, p\xa0=\xa00.10). Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate any statistically significant results in favour of physical activity.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nWe found evidence for a beneficial effect on activities of daily living in favour of interventions that aim to promote physical activity. Due to the high overall risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity of the included studies the results should be interpreted with caution, though.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nMethodologically sound studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base on the topic.