COMMUNICATION TO THE PUBLIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESTRICTIONS AGAINST “FRAMING” COPYRIGHT WORKS

Abstract

unfair terms, even if there is no express mechanism for specific firms/organisations to exercise control over them, and their work, during the creative process itself. For such persons, the Supreme Court’s new statutory approach as presently conceived, will be unhelpful. However promising the Supreme Court’s decision might seem from the perspective of the many individuals working in the gig-economy, then, and for precariously employed individuals more generally, much work is still to be done to fashion an approach to employment status that is adequately tailored to the real challenges which structural inequality and dependence generates in the context of capitalist work. Until it does so, approaches to employment status will continue to struggle to support, and advance, employment law’s “purposes”.