Conventional culture diagnostics vs. multiplex PCR for the detection of causative agents of vascular graft infections - results of a single centre observational pilot study.

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of vascular graft infections is of major importance in vascular surgery. The detection of causative microorganisms is needed for specific medical treatment, but conventional culture is often slow, insensitive and inconclusive due to antibiotic pre-treatment. Detection of bacterial DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) might bypass these problems. We hypothesised that multiplex PCR (mPCR) is feasible, fast and sensitive to detect causative microorganisms in vascular graft infections. Patients and methods: We performed a pilot observational prospective study comparing conventional culture and a commercial mPCR. Inclusion criteria were: confirmed graft infection, suspicious imaging, clinical suspicion, anastomotic aneurysm and repeated graft occlusion. Diagnostic methods were performed using identical samples. Time to result, microorganisms and antibiotic resistance in both groups were compared using Student s t-test or nonparametric tests. Results: 22 samples from 13 patients were assessed and 11 samples were negative for bacteria. Some showed multiple germs. In total, we found 15 different organisms. 13 samples matched, 9 had non-concordant results. Out of the mismatches 3 microorganisms identified in PCR were not detected by culture. Time to result with PCR was shorter (median 5\xa0h vs. 72\xa0h, p\xa0<\xa00.001) than with culture. No resistance genes were detected by mPCR, but conventional culture allowed susceptibility testing and revealed resistance in 5 samples. Conclusions: mPCR seems to be a feasible and quick tool to detect causes of vascular graft infections within 24\xa0h and might be helpful in antibiotic pre-treated patients. The detection of antibiotic resistance with mPCR needs improvement for clinical practice.