International journal of obesity (2005) | 2019

Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis in the BWeL trial

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


BackgroundThe Brief Intervention for Weight Loss Trial enrolled 1882 consecutively attending primary care patients who were obese and participants were randomised to physicians opportunistically endorsing, offering, and facilitating a referral to a weight loss programme (support) or recommending weight loss (advice). After one year, the support group lost 1.4\u2009kg more (95%CI 0.9 to 2.0): 2.4\u2009kg versus 1.0\u2009kg. We use a cohort simulation to predict effects on disease incidence, quality of life, and healthcare costs over 20 years.MethodsRandomly sampling from the trial population, we created a virtual cohort of 20 million adults and assigned baseline morbidity. We applied the weight loss observed in the trial and assumed weight regain over four years. Using epidemiological data, we assigned the incidence of 12 weight-related diseases depending on baseline disease status, age, gender, body mass index. From a healthcare perspective, we calculated the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) accruing and calculated the incremental difference between trial arms in costs expended in delivering the intervention and healthcare costs accruing. We discounted future costs and benefits at 1.5% over 20 years.ResultsCompared with advice, the support intervention reduced the cumulative incidence of weight-related disease by 722/100,000 people, 0.33% of all weight-related disease. The incremental cost of support over advice was £2.01million/100,000. However, the support intervention reduced health service costs by £5.86 million/100,000 leading to a net saving of £3.85 million/100,000. The support intervention produced 992 QALYs/100,000 people relative to advice.ConclusionsA brief intervention in which physicians opportunistically endorse, offer, and facilitate a referral to a behavioural weight management service to patients with a BMI of at least 30\u2009kg/m2 reduces healthcare costs and improves health more than advising weight loss.

Volume 43
Pages 2066 - 2075
DOI 10.1038/s41366-018-0295-7
Language English
Journal International journal of obesity (2005)

Full Text