The effectiveness of enhanced evidence-based care for depressive disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Several care models have been developed to improve treatment for depression, all of which provide “enhanced” evidence-based care (EEC). The essential component of these approaches is Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Specifically, Collaborative Care (CC), and Algorithm-guided Treatment (AGT), and Integrated Care (IC) all use varying forms of rigorous MBC assessment, care management, and/or treatment algorithms as key instruments to optimize treatment delivery and outcomes for depression. This meta-analysis systematically examined the effectiveness of EEC versus usual care for depressive disorders based on cluster-randomized studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo, EMBASE, up to January 6th, 2020 were searched for this meta-analysis. The electronic search was supplemented by a manual search. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and analyzed. A total of 29 studies with 15,255 participants were analyzed. EEC showed better effectiveness with the pooled RR for response of 1.30 (95%CI: 1.13–1.50, I 2 \u2009=\u200981.9%, P \u2009<\u20090.001, 18 studies), remission of 1.35 (95%CI: 1.11–1.64, I 2 \u2009=\u200985.5%, P \u2009<\u20090.001, 18 studies) and symptom reduction with a pooled SMD of −0.42 (95%CI: −0.61–(−0.23), I 2 \u2009=\u200994.3%, P \u2009<\u20090.001, 19 studies). All-cause discontinuations were similar between EEC and usual care with the pooled RR of 1.08 (95%CI: 0.94–1.23, I 2 \u2009=\u200968.0%, P \u2009=\u20090.303, 27 studies). This meta-analysis supported EEC as an evidence-based framework to improve the treatment outcome of depressive disorders. Review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42020163668