Management of endophthalmitis related to glaucoma drainage devices: review of the literature and our experience

Abstract

Glaucoma drainage device (GDD)-related endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of device implantation. There are no guidelines in the literature to assist clinicians in deciding if the GDD should be explanted or if patients require pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). This study compares the outcomes of GDD explantation with device retention and also independently compares the outcomes of PPV versus intravitreal antibiotics alone in patients with GDD-related endophthalmitis. A literature search for studies discussing GDD-related endophthalmitis from 2005 to 2019 was performed; 30 articles were included. The visual acuity/anatomical outcomes were compared between GDD explantation and retention, and between patients that received a PPV and those that did not. These outcomes were combined with a medical records review of 13 patients with GDD-related endophthalmitis from an academic institution. A total of 88 eyes were included. 70.5% underwent GDD explantation, while 37.8% received a PPV. GDD explantation was associated with a lower rate of evisceration/enucleation when compared to GDD retention (4.8% versus 19.2%, OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05–1.01, p\u2009=\u20090.05), but visual acuity outcomes were similar. No eyes that received an immediate vitrectomy became phthisic or required evisceration/enucleation, compared an evisceration/enucleation rate of 15.2% in eyes treated solely with intravitreal antibiotics (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04–1.33, p\u2009=\u20090.04). Explantation of the GDD and immediate vitrectomy are both associated with better anatomical outcomes in GDD-related endophthalmitis. Further research is needed to provide more definitive guidelines in the ideal management of these patients.