Scientific Reports | 2021

Air seal performance of personalized and statistically shaped 3D-printed face masks compared with market-available surgical and FFP2 masks

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has revealed alarming shortages of personal protective equipment for frontline healthcare professionals and the general public. Therefore, a 3D-printable mask frame was developed, and its air seal performance was evaluated and compared. Personalized masks (PM) based on individual face scans (n\u2009=\u20098) and a statistically shaped mask (SSM) based on a standardized facial soft tissue shape computed from 190 face scans were designed. Subsequently, the masks were additively manufactured, and in a second step, the PM and SSM were compared to surgical masks (SM) and FFP2 masks (FFP2) in terms of air seal performance. 3D-printed face models allowed for air leakage evaluation by measuring the pressure inside the mask in sealed and unsealed conditions during a breathing simulation. The PM demonstrated the lowest leak flow (p\u2009<\u20090.01) of inspired or expired unfiltered air of approximately 10.4\u2009±\u200916.4%, whereas the SM showed the highest (p\u2009<\u20090.01) leakage with 84.9\u2009±\u20097.7%. The FFP2 and SSM had similar values of 34.9\u2009±\u200918.5% leakage (p\u2009>\u20090.68). The developed framework allows for the time- and resource-efficient, on-demand, and in-house production of masks. For the best seal performance, an individually personalized mask design might be recommended.

Volume 11
Pages None
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-98963-0
Language English
Journal Scientific Reports

Full Text