Communications Biology | 2021

Temperature modulates stress response in mainstream anammox reactors

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Autotrophic nitrogen removal by anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (anammox) bacteria is an energy-efficient nitrogen removal process in wastewater treatment. However, full-scale deployment under mainstream conditions remains challenging for practitioners due to the high stress susceptibility of anammox bacteria towards fluctuations in dissolved oxygen (DO) and temperature. Here, we investigated the response of microbial biofilms with verified anammox activity to DO shocks under 20\u2009°C and 14\u2009°C. While pulse disturbances of 0.3\u2009mg\u2009L −1 DO prompted only moderate declines in the NH 4 + removal rates, 1.0\u2009mg\u2009L −1 DO led to complete but reversible inhibition of the NH 4 + removal activity in all reactors. Genome-centric metagenomics and metatranscriptomics were used to investigate the stress response on various biological levels. We show that temperature regime and strength of DO perturbations induced divergent responses from the process level down to the transcriptional profile of individual taxa. Community-wide gene expression differed significantly depending on the temperature regime in all reactors, and we found a noticeable impact of DO disturbances on genes involved in transcription, translation, replication and posttranslational modification at 20\u2009°C but not 14\u2009°C. Genome-centric analysis revealed that different anammox species and other key biofilm taxa differed in their transcriptional responses to distinct temperature regimes and DO disturbances. Niederdorfer et al. show that different anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (anammox) bacterial species and other key biofilm taxa vary in their transcriptional responses as a function of temperature and dissolved oxygen disturbances in an engineered ecosystem. This study highlights the links between microbial community stress response, individual stress response, and process level failure in anammox mainstream wastewater treatment.

Volume 4
Pages None
DOI 10.1038/s42003-020-01534-8
Language English
Journal Communications Biology

Full Text