Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association | 2019

Real-World Adequacy of Glycaemic Control in Treatment-Naïve Greek Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment with Metformin Monotherapy at the Maximum Tolerated Dose: The Reload Study.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


BACKGROUND\nMetformin, in the absence of contraindications or intolerance, is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This observational, retrospective study assessed the real-world adequacy of glycaemic control in Greek patients with T2DM initiating metformin monotherapy at maximum tolerated dose.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIncluded patients received metformin monotherapy for ≥24 months; relevant patient data were collected immediately prior to metformin initiation (baseline) and at other prespecified time points. The primary objective was to report, after 9 months of metformin treatment, the percentage of patients with baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥6.5% (≥48\u2009mmol/mol) achieving HbA1c<6.5%. Secondary objectives included the assessment of time spent with poor glycaemic control and time to treatment intensification. A sensitivity analysis assessed the percentage of patients with baseline HbA1c≥7% (≥53\u2009mmol/mol) achieving HbA1c<7% (<53\u2009mmol/mol).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the enrolled patients (N=316), 247 had baseline HbA1c ≥6.5%; following 9 months on metformin, 90 (36.4%) patients achieved HbA1c<6.5% (mean HbA1c change-1.3% [-14\u2009mmol/mol]). Median time of exposure to HbA1c ≥6.5% was 23.4 months and time to treatment intensification was 28.0 months. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% was 50% (mean HbA1c change -1.6% [-17\u2009mmol/mol]).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIrrespective of HbA1c target assessed, most patients with T2DM do not achieve the recommended HbA1c goals after 9 months on metformin while remained on monotherapy for up to 24 months. Addressing clinical inertia could improve disease outcomes and, possibly, economic burden.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1055/a-0824-6607
Language English
Journal Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association

Full Text