Endoscopy | 2019

ERCP assessment tool: evidence of validity and competency development during training.

 
 
 
 

Abstract


BACKGROUND\n\u2002The endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) is a 27-item competency assessment tool that was developed to support UK ERCP training. We evaluated validity of ERCP DOPS and competency development during training.\n\n\nMETHODS\n\u2002This prospective study analyzed ERCP DOPS performed in the UK between July 2016 and October 2018. Reliability was measured using Cronbach s alpha, and DOPS scores were benchmarked using the contrasting groups method. The percentage of competent scores was averaged for each item, domain, and overall rating, and stratified by lifetime procedure count to evaluate learning curves. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of DOPS competence.\n\n\nRESULTS\n\u2002818 DOPS (109 trainees, 80 UK centers) were analyzed. Overall Cronbach s alpha was 0.961. Attaining competency in 87\u200a% of assessed DOPS items provided the optimal competency benchmark. This was achieved in the domain sequence of: pre-procedure, post-procedure management, endoscopic non-technical skills, cannulation & imaging, and execution of selected therapy, and across all items after 200\u200a-\u200a249 procedures (89\u200a%). After 300 procedures, the benchmark was reached for selective cannulation (89\u200a%), but not for stenting (plastic 73\u200a%; metal 70\u200a%), sphincterotomy (80\u200a%), and sphincteroplasty (56\u200a%). On multivariable analysis, lifetime procedure count (P\u200a=\u200a0.002), easier case difficulty (P\u200a<\u200a0.001), trainee grade (P\u200a=\u200a0.03), and higher lifetime DOPS count (P\u200a=\u200a0.01) were predictors of DOPS competence.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\n\u2002This study provides novel validity, reliability, and learning curve data for ERCP DOPS.\u200aTrainees should have a minimum of 300 hands-on ERCP procedures before undertaking summative assessment for independent practice.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1055/a-0991-0044
Language English
Journal Endoscopy

Full Text