Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for decompensated gastroparesis: comprehensive motility analysis in relation to treatment outcomes

Abstract

Background and study aims\u2002 There are no reliable data to predict which patients with gastroparesis (GP) would benefit the most from gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM). The aim of the present study was to assess whether antro-duodenal motility patterns and pyloric distensibility can predict the outcome of G-POEM in patients with decompensated GP. Patients and methods\u2002 In an open-label study, patients with GP and refractory symptoms were eligible for treatment with G-POEM if treatment attempts according to a standardized stepwise protocol had failed. Baseline assessment included Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), C13-octanoic gastric emptying breath test and high-resolution antro-duodenal manometry. Pyloric distensibility using EndoFlip measurements was assessed at baseline and 3 months after the procedure. Explorative analyses were performed on potential predictors of response using logistic regression analyses. Results\u2002 Twenty-four patients with decompensated GP underwent G-POEM. At baseline, 78.3\u200a% and 61.9\u200a% of patients showed antral hypomotility and neuropathic motor patterns, respectively. The technical success rate was 100\u200a% (24/24). Mean GCSI improved significantly at 3, 6, and 12 months after G-POEM ( P \u200a=\u200a0.01). Median distensibility index (DI) improved significantly as compared with baseline (7.5 [6.9;11.7] vs. 5.3[3.1;8.1], P \u200a=\u200a0.004). A significant correlation was found between clinical response at 6 months and pyloric DI improvement ( P \u200a=\u200a0.003). No potential predictors of clinical response after G-POEM could be identified in an explorative analysis. Conclusions\u2002 G-POEM improved pyloric distensibility patterns in patients with decompensated GP. Clinical response at 6 months after G-POEM was associated with pyloric distensibility improvement. However, no potential predictors of response could be identified from either antro-duodenal motility patterns or pyloric distensibility.