Endoscopy International Open | 2021

Structured oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx assessment during routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy improves detection of pre- and early cancerous lesions: a multicenter, comparative study

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background and study aims\u2002 A structured assessment of the oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx (OHL) may improve the diagnostic yield for the detection of precancerous and early cancerous lesions (PECLs) during routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Thus, we aimed to compare routine EGDs ± structured OHL assessment (SOHLA), including photo documentation with regard to the detection of PECLs. Patients and methods\u2002 Consecutive patients with elective EGD were arbitrarily allocated to endoscopy lists with or without SOHLA. All detected OHL abnormalities were assessed by an otolaryngologist-head & neck surgeon (ORL-HNS) and the frequency of PECLS detected during SOHLA vs. standard cohort compared. Results\u2002 Data from 1000 EGDs with and 1000 EGDs without SOHLA were analyzed. SOHLA was successful in 93.3\u200a% of patients, with a median assessment time of 45 seconds (interquartile range: 40–50). SOHLA identified 46 potential PECLs, including two benign subepithelial lesions (4.6\u200a%, 95\u200a% CI: 3.4–6.1) while without SOHLA, no malignant and only one benign lesion was found ( P \u200a<\u200a0.05). ORL-HNS imaging review classified 23 lesions (2.3\u200a%, 95\u200a% CI: 1.5–3.4) as concerning and ORL-HNS clinic assessment was arranged. This identified six PECLs (0.6\u200a%, 95\u200a% CI: 0.2–1.3) including two pharyngeal squamous cell lesions (0.2\u200a%) demonstrating high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma in situ (CIS) and four premalignant glottic lesions (0.4\u200a%) demonstrating low-grade dysplasia and CIS. Conclusion\u2002 In the routine setting of a gastrointestinal endoscopy practice precancerous and early cancerous lesions of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx are rare (<\u200a1\u200a%) but can be detected with a structured assessment of this region during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Volume 9
Pages E154 - E162
DOI 10.1055/a-1311-1014
Language English
Journal Endoscopy International Open

Full Text